Anthela acuta

1 Common Anthelid at Rosedale, NSW

Anthela acuta at Rosedale, NSW - 15 Sep 2025 08:53 PM
Anthela acuta at Rosedale, NSW - 15 Sep 2025 08:53 PM
Request use of media

Identification history

Anthela acuta 4 Oct 2025 ibaird
Anthela deficiens 3 Oct 2025 ibaird
Anthela acuta 3 Oct 2025 jb2602

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

6 comments

ibaird wrote:
   3 Oct 2025
A. deficiens?
JulieMorgan wrote:
   3 Oct 2025
I have had similar moths in the past (as early as 2010) identified as belonging to the Anthela acuta group by Ted Edwards. I know that a lot of work has been done on Anthela since that identification. I don't think that the shape of the moth is consistent with A. deficiens.
ibaird wrote:
   3 Oct 2025
OK, thanks Julie. You are likely to be more familiar with the species than I am. Can you indicate how it's shape differs from A. acuta?
JulieMorgan wrote:
   4 Oct 2025
Hi Ian,
I have learned a lot from both you and John and your work on NatureMapr has created a wonderful resource for moth enthusiasts.

To begin, I should say that I am no expert on Anthela. My comments are as a result of my own observations and precious time spent at ANIC learning from people who know a lot more than I do. That said, I also acknowledge that much has happened in the world of moths since that time.

My colleagues in MABA have indicated that Lepidoptera records on ALA are not verified before being posted and so I am cautious when using their records for identification. I look for who has verified the records on iNat as the “wisdom of the crowd” is not always based on knowledge of the species. Looking at the Anthela deficiens records on ALA, the moths posted by Nick Lambert, Desmond Wells and Rebecca Stroud show a different shape to my eye – a boxier shape compared to Anthela acuta.
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/34cfec67-be9e-400c-8604-59244aa250b4#gallery

John Lenagan’s comments in Rebecca Stoud’s identification indicate that there double spot below the dissecting line on the lower wing and the single spot above the line on the upper wing in A. deficiens. These features are present in these 3 specimens. Based on this, I think that John’s moth (and also Lisa H’s from Moruya) are from the Anthela acuta group but I happy to be corrected as there is much to learn in the world of moths. Julie
ibaird wrote:
   4 Oct 2025
Thanks a million Julie. That'ss very useful comment, I concur with your views overall. In the absence of better information my usual policy when a detailed view is posited that holds up is to go with it.
Looking at 'Bold Hobern' for both species see below. is that rule borne out by what you see there? (ie at least for one specimen of A. deficiens)?
https://bold-au.hobern.net/specimens.php?taxid=324412
https://bold-au.hobern.net/specimens.php?taxid=192042
Cheers.
Ian Baird
JulieMorgan wrote:
   4 Oct 2025
Hi Ian,
Thank you for sending the links. Yes, it does for one specimen of A. deficiens. Unfortunately, I can't access all the images of A. acuta. I often have trouble accessing the website generally. Not sure why. What comes to mind is the variety of specimens at ANIC and the work that has yet to be done with the Anthela genus.
Cheers, Julie

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

Additional information

  • 25mm to 50mm Animal size

Species information

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Verified by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
827,424 sightings of 23,514 species from 15,122 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
NatureMapr is developed by at3am IT Pty Ltd and is proudly Australian made