Contribute to nature positive outcomes across Australia


Announcements

19 Mar 2026

NatureMapr will return to its roots, as a community focused biodiversity reporting platform, primarily focused on the ACT.We've spent recent months reducing platform complexity and operational costs.W...


Continue reading

Thank you

Known issue affecting NatureMapr Data Collector mobile app

Platform update (mini)

NatureMapr moves to simpler, flatter national structure

Discussion

dhobern wrote:
6 min ago
Very strongly marked but not celidotus

Platyptilia celidotus
dhobern wrote:
7 min ago
Probably Megalorhipida leucodactylus, but I can't rule out Stangeia xerodes with such a worn individual.

Platyptilia celidotus
dhobern wrote:
8 min ago
I strongly suspect this one is a well marked Stenoptilia zophodactylus, but the angle is too hard to be able to identify it confidently.

Platyptilia celidotus
WendyEM wrote:
9 min ago
too warn to be able to suggest a species.

Abantiades (genus)
MattM wrote:
1 hr ago
I'm still really unsure as to the differences between furva and rubescens. Have heard there is currently a genetic study being completed on the two species in an attempt to ascertain how different they are (if they even are different). I would have otherwise called this rubescens if not for the location.

Speculantha furva

Top contributors

Top moderators

836,864 sightings of 23,683 species from 15,571 members
NatureMapr is developed by at3am | Made and hosted in Australia | privacy | CCA 3.0