Going by I.D. features in M.o.Victoria Pt.8 I believe this is P. sparsa. While the left forewing appears to have a break in the sub terminal line, suggesting P. diemeni, I don't see a clear break on the right wing. It is borderline though, in such a pale moth.
No I meant that the exact location should be provided as this location is suppressed from the public and not provided to the ALA if that option is ticked
@michaelmulvaney please clarify that you are willing to accept false locations in the carpark, as well as supressing the location. If we are going to falsify locations as well as supressing them, i suggest they should be located to a place that will clearly be evident as false. The carpark location is a particularly poor choice as it could play into the debate whether there is a safety issue and maybe could affect decisions to cull certain individual dingoes.
John has already suppressed the location from public view which means only john, the moderators, the rangers and any approved researcher can see the location. The record is not sent to the ALA - Johns concerns are well founded but as you say clicking the suppress the location option should address them. The moderators could also mark the species as sensitive but this would not add any further protection to those where the protection has bene suppressed.